Calls to Ban Of Mice and Men from GCSE Syllabus Over Use of Racial Slurs

The debate over which books belong on school reading lists is as old as the educational system itself. In recent years, Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck’s iconic 1937 novel, has become a focal point of controversy. Calls to ban the novel from the GCSE syllabus—especially for its repeated use of racial slurs—have reignited passionate discussions among students, teachers, parents, and policymakers.

This article explores why Of Mice and Men faces renewed scrutiny, the experiences of students like Angel Mhande in Belfast, and the broader challenges of teaching classic literature containing offensive language in a modern, multicultural classroom.

Why Is Of Mice and Men in the Spotlight?

Classic Status and Controversial Content

John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men has often been heralded as a landmark of American literature. Its exploration of friendship, dreams, and disenfranchisement amid the Great Depression resonates across generations. However, critics argue that its frequent use of the N-word (commonly referenced as the “mice and men n word page” in search inquiries) and other racial slurs make it inappropriate for young readers in today’s diverse classrooms.

Recent Calls for Removal

The current push to ban Of Mice and Men from the GCSE syllabus gathered steam when Angel Mhande, a Belfast student, publicly challenged the book’s inclusion in exam curricula due to its offensive language. Mhande’s argument is representative of a wider concern: should books with racist language in schools continue to be a part of compulsory learning, or does their presence cause real harm to students of color?

The Case for Keeping Of Mice and Men in Schools

Promoting Historical Understanding

Supporters argue that Of Mice and Men provides a valuable lens through which students can examine the social realities of 1930s America.

• Understanding Context: The racial slurs and prejudiced attitudes depicted in the novel reflect the pervasive racism of the era. Teaching the book helps students identify and critically engage with these historical injustices.
• Encouraging Discussion: Difficult topics, including the portrayal of Crooks, the only major Black character, can spark important conversations about both historical and modern racism.

Literature as a Mirror and Window

Literature can serve both as a mirror, reflecting aspects of one’s own life, and as a window into other realities. Removing books like Of Mice and Men from the classroom may limit opportunities for students to grapple with uncomfortable truths and develop empathy.

Teacher Perspectives

Many educators feel equipped to handle sensitive content with proper guidance and discussion. They emphasize:

• Framing offensive language within historical context
• Creating classroom norms to discuss sensitive issues respectfully
• Encouraging students to voice their discomfort and learn from it

Arguments Supporting a Ban

The Risks of Normalizing Offensive Language

Despite the educational value that some see in analyzing Of Mice and Men, critics argue that repeated exposure to racial slurs—even with context—can be harmful.

• Emotional Impact: Black and minority ethnic students may feel targeted or alienated by reading racial slurs aloud in a classroom setting.
• Perpetuating Harm: Normalizing the language, even for academic purposes, risks desensitizing students to its power and pain.

Voices from the Student Body

Angel Mhande’s decision to raise her concerns with CCEA (Council for the Curriculum, Examinations & Assessment) highlights how student voices are shaping the debate. Students have described feeling “uncomfortable” and “upset” when required to read or discuss the text. Their experiences have prompted many to ask: should Of Mice and Men be banned, or at least replaced with more current or less problematic works?

The Role of GCSE Literature Racial Sensitivity

Critics assert that the GCSE literature curriculum should reflect racial sensitivity in book selection. As UK classrooms become increasingly diverse, the inclusion of works with racist language becomes more controversial.

Official Responses and Policy Changes

The CCEA Of Mice and Men Decision

In response to ongoing criticism, the CCEA has reviewed the status of Of Mice and Men on their syllabi. While some awarding bodies, schools, and districts have taken steps to remove the novel, others retain it, citing academic freedom and the need to engage with challenging literature.

Banning Classic Novels in the UK—Where Do We Draw the Line?

Of Mice and Men is far from the only book challenged on these grounds. The question of banning classic novels in the UK, especially those containing racial slurs or controversial themes, raises further questions:

• Should problematic language be a reason to remove a book, or an opportunity to teach why it is harmful?
• Who should decide which books are offensive in schools UK—students, teachers, parents, or governing bodies?

Literature, Censorship, and the Classroom Debate

Books With Racist Language—How Should Schools Approach Them?

The presence of offensive language in books assigned at school is not unique to Of Mice and Men. From To Kill a Mockingbird to Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, educators and parents have grappled with how to balance historical authenticity with present-day values.

Options for Schools:

1. Contextualize, Don’t Censor: Teach the text but provide historical background, guidance, and support throughout.
2. Selective Removal: Remove the novel from required reading lists but allow access for voluntary study or advanced coursework.
3. Complete Ban: Eliminate the book from the curriculum entirely and select more contemporary works that tackle similar themes without harmful language.

Crooks Character Racism—A Case Study

Crooks, the stable hand, is subjected to racial discrimination throughout Of Mice and Men. His portrayal provides a stark illustration of systemic racism, but the repeated use of the N-word in dialogue (often searched as “of mice and men n word page”) makes these scenes particularly contentious.

Two Perspectives:

• Educational Value: Teaching Crooks’ experience can shed light on the consequences of racism and prompt meaningful class discussions about prejudice, both past and present.
• Potential Harm: For Black students, encountering such language and themes in a classroom setting can be distressing and make them feel isolated.

The Of Mice and Men Classroom Debate

Classrooms across the UK have hosted heated debates—led by both teachers and students—on the role of controversial texts. The Of Mice and Men classroom debate remains ongoing:

• Some argue that addressing racism head-on, even through uncomfortable literature, better prepares students for the realities of the world.
• Others believe there are equally powerful, less harmful texts that can fulfill educational goals without causing unnecessary pain.

Global and Historical Perspective on Challenged Books

International Approaches

Countries around the world have taken varying stances on books containing racial slurs in literature. While some states or nations have banned or restricted such works, others advocate for nuanced teaching over outright removal.

Trends in Challenged Books—Of Mice and Men as a Case Study

Of Mice and Men ranks among the most challenged books in schools, according to both UK and US data. The reasons frequently cited include “racial slurs in literature,” offensive themes, and unsuitable language for young readers.

Should Of Mice and Men Be Banned? A Nuanced Question

There is no straightforward answer. The debate around challenged books Of Mice and Men reflects wider conversations about free speech, inclusivity, and evolving societal norms.

Balancing Literary Value With Modern Sensitivities

Updated Approaches to Sensitive Content

Modern educational practice encourages teachers to approach texts containing offensive language with care. Strategies include:

• Providing clear trigger warnings before beginning the book
• Offering alternative assignments for students who feel uncomfortable
• Facilitating open discussion about why language that was once acceptable is now recognized as harmful

Alternatives to Of Mice and Men in GCSE Literature

In response to calls for the Of Mice and Men ban, some educators suggest replacing it with:

• Contemporary novels focused on race, identity, and injustice but written in a tone respectful of present-day values.
• UK-based works that center stories of marginalized voices without resorting to outdated or offensive language.

Key Questions for Parents, Teachers, and Students

What Should Guide Our Choices?

• Is historical authenticity more important than avoiding harm in the modern classroom?
• Are we protecting students by removing books, or depriving them of critical learning opportunities?
• Should decisions be localized, with schools able to determine what’s best for their students, or should there be a national standard for books offensive in schools UK?

The Way Forward: Respectful, Inclusive Education

There is broad agreement that no student should feel uncomfortable, excluded, or targeted by the materials they study. Yet, how to achieve this—especially when teaching classic literature—remains a topic for meaningful dialogue.

Schools might consider the following:

• Conducting surveys to gather student opinions on required reading
• Consulting with cultural and racial sensitivity experts when revising syllabi
• Ensuring robust teacher training to handle sensitive classroom discussions

Conclusion

The controversy surrounding the Of Mice and Men GCSE syllabus reveals deep divides about the function of literature in education. Supporters see the novel as a vehicle for historical understanding, while critics argue for its removal based on the emotional harm that reading racial slurs can do to students of color. As UK schools reflect on the call to ban Of Mice and Men, it is essential to weigh both the educational value and the emotional wellbeing of students.

The challenge for educators, parents, and policymakers is to foster inclusive, respectful learning environments without shying away from exploring the uncomfortable chapters of our shared history. Whether Of Mice and Men remains on the syllabus or is replaced with newer works, the most important outcome will be classrooms where all students feel seen, heard, and included in the discussion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What page is the N-word found in Of Mice and Men?

The word appears multiple times throughout the text, often in scenes involving Crooks, the Black stable hand. The specific page varies depending on the edition, but it is a recurring presence and central to current controversies.

Why is Of Mice and Men controversial in UK schools?

The recurring use of racial slurs, particularly the N-word, has led to criticism of the novel as inappropriate for school settings, prompting calls for its removal from the GCSE syllabus and debate about books with racist language in schools.

Who is Angel Mhande and what role did she play in this controversy?

Angel Mhande is a Belfast student who voiced concern about being required to study Of Mice and Men, drawing attention to the impact on minority students and sparking renewed discussion about GCSE literature racial sensitivity.

Are there other books currently challenged for similar reasons?

Yes. Titles like To Kill a Mockingbird, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, and even some contemporary novels have been challenged or removed for using racial slurs or perpetuating harmful stereotypes.

Take Action: Join the Conversation

As the debate continues, share your perspective with your local school or educational council. Whether you believe in contextual learning or advocate for removal, your voice shapes the future of classroom reading.